[apluslist] Difference between src/lisp.0 and src/lisp.1

[Neil Roeth]

I believe the lisp.1 directory is the newer version.  I used that for the
Debian package.

On Nov 14, Vladimir N. Kutinsky (kutinskyv at obninsk.com) wrote:
 > 
 > I was a bit confused about this extra "option" as well. The first difference
 > is that /lisp.1/.emacs seems outdated cause it calls aplus from
 > "/aplus-fsf-4.18/" rather than "/aplus-fsf-4.20/" folder. Nevertheless, i
 > decided on loading aplus.el from /lisp.1/ because when xemacs loads it, its
 > gives out the string i got so much accustomed to, "Loading
 > /usr/loca/aplus-fsf-4.20/lisp.1/aplus...done" (i changed the path to
 > aplus.el, of course). Using the other aplus.el results in "Loading
 > cus-face...done" and thats it, nothing else. At the same time, a+ seems to
 > work alright in both cases. Other than that, i found no other differences.
 > 
 > Regards,
 > Vladimir Kutinsky
 > 
 > > -----Original Message-----
 > > From: apluslist-bounces at aplusdev.net
 > > [mailto:apluslist-bounces at aplusdev.net]On Behalf Of Jochen Schmitt
 > > Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 11:40 PM
 > > To: apluslist at aplusdev.net
 > > Subject: [apluslist] Difference between src/lisp.0 and src/lisp.1
 > >
 > >
 > > Hello,
 > >
 > > I have a special question:
 > >
 > > What is the difference between the src/lisp.0 and the src/lisp.1
 > > directory?
 > >
 > > Best Regards:
 > >
 > > Jochen Schmitt
 > >
 > 
 > _______________________________________________
 > apluslist mailing list
 > apluslist at aplusdev.net
 > http://aplusdev.net/mailman/listinfo/apluslist

-- 
Neil Roeth